StockCharts.com - Blogs

It is shaping up to be a banner month for December volume. On this chart, the vertical black line shows the beginning of December, the red line the end of December (D) and the green line the end of January (J). Over the last three years, there was strong volume in early December (usually the first 2-3 days). In 2002 and 2003, volume soon tapered off and December finished with its normal below average volume performance.

Things are different this year, at least for the first 17 calendar days of the month. Nasdaq volume started strong and continues strong with 12 of the last 13 trading days above 2 billion. The 13-day average is 2.314 billion, which is comfortable above the 2-year average of 1.71 billion shares per day. This kind of high volume was last seen in January 2004, which marked a peak in the index. Perhaps the fund managers are making their move a month early. Also notice that the Nasdaq peaked in the middle of January the last two years. 2003 marked a relatively minor peak and 2004 marked a more significant peak.

So what does it mean? Even though volume has been high the last 13 days, the index has basically traded flat. This amounts to spinning your wheels or burning up a lot of fuel without going anywhere and suggests that a period of correction or consolidation lies ahead.

The daily chart of the US Dollar Index shows that the dollar is trying to put in a bottom. The encouraging signs are that the 9-year low earlier this month survived a sharp retest this week, the index has broken above the short-term declining tops line, and there is a PMO crossover buy signal. The problem is that sentiment has moved from extreme bearishness to neutral, which means that quite a few bulls have arrived on the scene. This happened too quickly, in my opinion, and there may be more work to do (and lower lows seen) before the bottoming process is complete.

There is encouragement on the long-term (monthly) chart as well, because there is a strong zone of support between 78 and 80, and the PMO is very overbought. Nevertheless, the PMO is still falling, and it needs to turn up before we can begin to believe the long-term down trend has ended.

Today we take a very long-term look at the relative valuation of integrated oil-related shares in comparison to gold shares ($XOI/$HUI). After the very long rise in gold shares in both absolute and relative terms; we find the present time is opportune to prune back long gold holdings and buy into integrated oil shares at current levels. This certainly isn't a popular decision given many are ‘gold bugs', but the fact of the matter is that this investment allocation merits strong consideration; for given when the Fed raises interest rates….they generally go too far and gold shares do quite poorly.

However, the technical picture is looking up. The ratio simply shows how ‘beat up' oil-related shares are to gold – losing nearly 80% since their 2000 high, but prices formed an absolute low in late-2003 followed by a successful test of the 50-week moving average. This, coupled with momentum turning higher from oversold levels suggests that the recent decline in integrated oil shares is an opportunity to buy oil related shares as a multi-year advance in both absolute as well as relative terms appears underway. If the ratio simply retraces back to its 200-week moving average, we would do very well. But if 50% of its decline is retraced…they we will have done enormously well.

This time last year I wrote about my expectation for long-term interest rates to start moving higher during 2004. I got it only half right. They moved higher during the first half, but then fell back during the second half. It looks like bond yields will end the year pretty much where they started. A number of readers have asked why bond yields have stayed so low for so long and for my outlook for next year. Chart 1 shows bond yields turning back down at the start of 2000 and bottoming in mid-2003. The 2000 peak in yields coincided a falling stock market and rising bond prices. The deflation threat that existed at that time caused a major decoupling of bond and stock prices. As a result, bond yields and stocks became positively correlated. Bond yields turned up shortly after stocks during the first half of 2003, right after the start of the Iraq war and a plunge in oil prices. That caused a major rotation out of bonds and back into stocks -- reversing the 2000-2002 bear market trend. Chart 1 shows the yield on the Ten-year Treasury note turning up during the first half of this year and breaking the four-year down trendline (see circle). That wasn't a surprise. What was a surprise was the subsequent decline in yields back to that same trendline (see arrow). Let's take a closer look.

Chip's personal message goes here, talking about what John Murphy, Richard Rhodes, Carl Swenlin and the rest of the gang have to say in this issue. This segment should be limited to a couple sentences... we want to keep people engaged with concise text that is valuable and useful to them. Leads into Chip's column about specific issues...

Chip's Headline Goes Here

Chip's market commentary goes here. Chip's market commentary goes here. Chip's market commentary goes here. Chip's market commentary goes here. Chip's market commentary goes here. Chip's market commentary goes here. Chip's market commentary goes here and here. Chip's market commentary goes here. Chip's market commentary goes here. Chip's market commentary goes here. Chip's market commentary goes here. Chip's market commentary goes here.

More of Chip's market commentary goes here. More of Chip's market commentary goes here. More of Chip's market commentary goes here. More of Chip's market commentary goes here. More of Chip's market commentary goes here. More of Chip's market commentary goes here. More of Chip's market commentary goes here. More of Chip's market commentary goes here and here. More of Chip's market commentary goes here. More of Chip's market commentary goes here. More of Chip's market commentary goes here. More of Chip's market commentary goes here and there. More of Chip's market commentary goes here. More of Chip's market commentary goes here.

SUB-HEADLINE GOES HERE - More informative information goes here. More informative information goes here. More informative information goes here. More informative information goes here.

More informative information goes here. More informative information goes here. More informative information goes here. More informative information goes here. More informative information goes here. More informative information goes here. More informative information goes here.

WRAP UP HEADLINE - Here are the final conclusions, call-to-actions and parting shots. Here are the final conclusions, call-to-actions and parting shots. Here are the final conclusions, call-to-actions and parting shots. Here are the final conclusions, call-to-actions and parting shots.

While the Nasdaq trades near a 52-week high, the Semiconductor HOLDRS (SMH) remains well below its Jan-04 high and has shown relative weakness over the last few months. There is also a split within the group as Applied Materials challenges resistance and Micron Technology (MU) tests support. Until both get on the same page, the Semiconductor group is likely to remain in a funk and continue underperforming the Nasdaq.

Applied Materials (AMAT) formed a double bottom over the last few months and is testing key resistance around 18. The double bottom represents a base over the last few months with support at 15.5 and resistance at 18. A break above 18 would confirm the pattern and the upside target would be around 20.5. Upside volume has been rather strong lately and this increases the chances of a breakout.

While AMAT is challenging resistance, Micron Technology (MU) is testing support and formed a potential head-and-shoulders over the last few months. This pattern is mostly associated with reversals, but can also signal a continuation. A move below neckline support would signal a continuation lower and project further weakness to around 9. Should MU hold support at 11, look for a break above 13 to ignite the stock and the Semiconductor HOLDRS.

When there is weak cash flow into Rydex Precious Metals Fund it is a fairly reliable warning to expect price weakness in the short-term, and sometimes the corrections can be quite severe.

As a general rule we expect cash flow to more or less follow prices -- when prices are going up, cash flow should also be moving up proportionately -- however, when prices rise and cash flow suddenly dries up, it tells us that the sector is losing support. Higher prices are failing to attract more money.

On the chart we can see four negative divergences between cash flow and price. In the first three instances they resulted in price declines. The current divergence seems to be playing out as expected and a correction in precious metals stocks has begun.

Today we look at the high relative valuation of Consumer Discretionary vs. Staples stocks. Current levels have not been seen; at the 2000 high in which the bubble burst', the ratio stood near 1.40. We believe that this stretched valuation' argues for one to reassess their portfolios in terms of the shares within them. To move into Staples would imply a defensive move' related to a decline in the overall stock market. While that may not be today's or tomorrow's businessone must be cognizant of the high probability discretionary stocks will not outperform from this point forward.

If we are correct, and we must be buyers' then we must consider the largest holdings in each group. If we must be long: Altria (MO), Anheuser Busch (BUD), Coca-Cola (KO), Colgate Palmolive (CL), Gillette (G), Kimerbly Clark (KMB), Pepsico (PEP), Proctor & Gamble (PG), Wal-Mart (WMT) and Walgreen's (WAG). Conversely, we would be sellers of: Carnival (CCL), Comcast (CMCSA), ebay (EBAY), Home Depot (HD), Lowe's (LOW), McDonald's (MCD), Target (TGT), Time Warner (TWX), Viacom B (VIA.B) and Walt Disney (DIS). It may seem counter intuitiverelative performance is important.

The last paragraph in the September 23 report carried the headline: LONG TERM IMPLICATIONS FOR STOCKS AREN'T GOOD. To repeat what I wrote then, "An October pullback in oil would probably be helpful to the stock market during the fourth quarter. The ability of oil to stay over $40, however, will remain a drag on the stock market and the economy...and will probably limit stock market gains during 2005". So far, the October top in oil (and this week's downturn) has been bullish for stocks and fits into the idea of a fourth quarter rally lasting into the start of next year. The longer-term picture is still in doubt. If this is just an intermediate correction in oil, and if oil starts to rise again next year from $40 (as I suspect it will), the stock market could run into trouble. That's another reason why $40 crude is such an important number. In case you're wondering if oil really has an impact on stocks, take a look at the last two charts. The peak in oil during March 2003 (at the start of the second Iraq war) coincided exactly with a major bottom in the S&P 500 (see first arrow). The second peak in oil this October (see second arrow) helped launch the latest S&P 500 upleg. Right now, the drop in oil is working in the stock market's favor.

Happy Holidays! Welcome to this special holiday edition of ChartWatchers! This time around John explains why $40 is such an important number of Oil prices, Richard explains why he'd buy Coke but sell McDonalds, Carl has a chart that explains while Precious Metal prices are headed lower, and Arthur Hill looks at AMAT and MU. Here we go...