StockCharts Blogs - ChartWatchers

BE PREPARED

In our last commentary, we noted that the S&P Energy ETF (XLE) was in the process of forming a bearish consolidation that argues for sharply lower prices. And since then, prices have consolidated further, but
are now poised to breakdown below trendline support and the October-2008 lows. However, this sector remains a favorite of both fundamental and momentum traders as perceived safety plays. However,
we would argue that while they may be so now; they will not be in the future, and in fact - if the market does indeed rally at some point soon - they shall not lead the rally.

In support of this thesis, we look at the S&P Energy ETF vs the S&P Consumer Discretionary ETF (XLE:XLY). Arguably, in this horrid economy, one would think that you would have to be out of your
collective trading mind to buy anything related to the discretionary stocks. But, the ratio chart shows that XLE has under-performed XLY since June-2008, and we are more interested know in the fact a bearish
consolidation has formed, which would imply the trend that began in June-2008 is about to reassert itself in the weeks ahead. Moreover, we see the very same pattern when we look at XLE vs the S&P 500 Spyder (SPY). This leads us to conclude that XLE is not where one wants to hold long positions; either in bull or bear moves, for it is poised to under-perform rather dramatically - perhaps by as much as 25%
difference if our back of envelope technical measurement target a 1.8 ratio. What one was considered "safety", will soon become a source of funds for more "risky" assets. Be forewarned; be prepared.

MASTERING OUR BLOGS

In case you missed it, we are now publishing a ton of new content about charting and technical analysis on our seven(!) different blogs.  One of the great things about blogs is that you can "subscribe" to a blog and then get notified as soon as anything new is posted.  Each one of our blogs has a "Subscribe" button up top and I encourage you to click on them and set up a subscription in order to stay up-to-date with the latest info from us.

If you are new to using blog subscriptions (also called "RSS Feeds"), then just click on the "View Feed XML" link that appears after you hit subscribe.  That should take you to a page that lets you subscribe to the feed using your web browser.  For more information about Feeds, I urge you to review the information on this page and watch the video at the bottom (it's very entertaining!).

Finally, if you are like me, you want to everything that's happening at StockCharts all the time.  If that's the case, then instead of looking at each one of our blogs individually, you can look at the "Master StockCharts Blog" which contains copies of all the recent articles from all of the other seven blogs in one place.  You can also chose to subscribe to the master blog instead of subscribing to all seven of the other blogs.

JUICING UP YOUR RETURNS

I receive a lot of questions regarding the "ultra" shares and "ultrashort" shares and how to effectively trade them.  In particular, there are always questions asking why those "juiced" ETF returns don't correspond to the indices they're supposed to track over time.  Let me give you an example.  Take a look at the two charts below.  The first is a five month chart of the Dow Jones U.S. Financial Index ($DJUSFN), while the second reflects the ProShares UltraShort Financial (SKF) during that same timeframe.  The SKF is designed to inversely track the $DJUSFN at a 200% clip.  In order to benefit from weakness in financials, you could purchase the SKF and profit to the tune of 200% the decline in the index.  Just keep in mind that a ride on Space Mountain at DisneyWorld will seem like a stroll in the park compared to an investment in the SKF, however.  :-)

On the line charts (line charts show only closing prices) below, take a look at where the SKF closed on February 20th vs. January 20th vs. November 20th.  It was lower each time.  But how can that be if the $DJUSFN is lower each time?  If the index is putting in lower lows, shouldn't the ultrashort SKF be putting in higher highs?  The answer is no - check this out:

On November 20th, the $DJUSFN closed at 167.95 and the SKF closed at 262.45.  On February 20th, the $DJUSFN closed at 143.56 while the SKF closed at 188.25.  So over the last three months, the $DJUSFN fell 14.52%.  Since the SKF is designed to inversely double the returns of the $DJUSFN, one would reasonably expect to see the SKF closing roughly 29% higher than it did in November.  Instead, the SKF has FALLEN from 262.45 to 188.25, or 28.27%.  It should have GAINED 29%, but instead it DECLINED 28%.  What gives?  Well, so long as the index moves in one direction or the other, juiced ETFs do a fine job of following at a 200% clip - generally speaking.  However, after several days of ups and downs in the index, the juiced ETFs lose their value and cannot fulfill that 200% promise.  For a fairly simple explanation, go to our website at www.investedcentral.com and click on "Trading the Juiced ETFs".  It's roughly a 15 minute demonstration showing why the juiced ETFs cannot keep pace over time.  If you like to trade juiced ETFs, it will be well worth the time.
 
Here's the bottom line.  Avoid the temptation to trade the juiced ETFs based on its technicals.  I've come to realize that the technicals associated with those ETFs are irrelevant.  Instead, determine your entry and exit points based solely on the technicals of the underlying index that the ETF is designed to track.  From that index, determine your target and apply those measurements to the juiced ETF.
 
Happy trading!

TECHS TAKE A PUNCH

Two weeks ago I featured the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQQ) with a triangle breakout, strong OBV and relative strength. The ETF surged to resistance from the early January high, but ultimately failed to break above this key level. With a sharp decline over the last eight trading days, the trading bias has quickly shifted back to the bears. The failure at resistance, gap down, trendline break and MACD crossover are all bearish until proven otherwise. At the very least, QQQQ needs to fill Tuesday's gap to merit a reassessment.

The second chart shows the Nasdaq with similar characteristics. There are, however, two notable differences. While QQQQ reached its early January high and broke the triangle trendline, the Nasdaq fell short of this high and did not break the triangle trendline. The Nasdaq is a much broader index than
the Nasdaq 100 (QQQQ) and shows relative weakness. With a gap down, trendline break and MACD crossover, the bulk of the evidence is currently bearish for the Nasdaq as well. Before getting too bearish, notice that trading has been extremely choppy since October. Both the Nasdaq and QQQQ have traded on either side of their October lows the last four months. While the bias is currently bearish, the seas remain treacherous for both bulls and bears.

There is also a video version of the this analysis available at TDTrader.com - Click Here.

A LOT OF MARKETS ARE AT CRITICAL CHART JUNCTURES...

GOLD TOUCHES $1000 FOR FIRST TIME IN A YEAR... A number of financial markets are testing important chart points. Let's start with gold. Bullion touched $1,000 today for the first time since last March. Chart 1 shows the streetTracks Gold Trust (GLD) very close to touching its March 2008 high at 100. On a short-term basis, however, the price of gold looks overbought. Some profit-taking from this level wouldn't be surprising. If that's true, some counter-trend moves may be seen in some other markets. The dollar may have also started one.

DOLLARS DIPS AS EURO BOUNCES ... The U.S. Dollar has been rising along with gold since December. Chart 2, however, shows the Power Shares DB US Dollar Index Fund (UUP) dropping today from chart resistance near its November high. Chart 3 shows the Euro bouncing off chart support along its November low. That suggests that some "short-term" market dynamics might be changing. A weaker dollar might contribute to some profit-taking in gold and buying in some oversold commodities. A bouncing Euro might suggest that the recent selloff in stocks is overdone as well. I've shown before that stocks have been trading in tandem with the Euro since midyear and opposite the dollar.

RETEST

The long-awaited retest of the November lows has finally arrived. The S&P 500 is still slightly above that support, but the Dow has penetrated it. Even though every rally since November has been greeted with intense hope of a new advance that would end the bear market, the market gradually rolled over into a declining trend after the January top.

The November bottom was also a 9-Month Cycle bottom. In a bull market we would expect the market to rally for several months. The fact that the rally failed so quickly, is a very bearish sign.

 

The longer-term view shows that the 2002 bear market lows are also being tested again, so the market is at a very critical point. Many people who are still holding equities (at a 50% loss) are counting on being bailed out by a big rally. If prices fall significantly below long-term support, we are likely to see another selling stampede.

The long-term condition of the market is deeply oversold, as demonstrated by the Percent of Stocks Above Their 200-EMA. This indicator has never been at these low levels for such an extended period of time. Normally, a rally is in the cards as soon as these levels are reached, but the market is flat on its back, and it is hard to say when it will recover. It is important not to get too anxious to get back in. We are in a bear market, and negative outcomes are much more likely than positive ones.

Also, remember that oversold conditions in a bear market are extremely dangerous. If the current support zone fails, a market crash could quickly follow.

 

The medium-term condition of the market is neutral. Note that the ITBM and ITVM charts below are mid-range and falling. This is not a level from which we would expect a powerful rally to be launched.

 

Bottom Line: The market is in the midst of a retest of very important support. Since we are in a bear market, I expect that the support will fail.

Technical analysis is a windsock, not a crystal ball. Be prepared to adjust your tactics and strategy if conditions change.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS 101 - PART 2

This is the second part of a series of articles about Technical Analysis from a new course we're developing. If you are new to charting, these articles will give you the "big picture" behind the charts on our site. if you are an "old hand", these articles will help ensure you haven't "strayed too far" from the basics. Enjoy! 

(Click here to see the first part of this series.)

The Value of Technical Analysis

The reason technical analysis has value is that directional price moves are often sustained for a period of time allowing analysts to detect and profit from the change in price. Even though a technical analyst has many math-based tools to analyze price and volume movement, the process is ultimately an art in the study of human behavior.

Just as the meteorologist can never guarantee a weather forecast, a technical analyst can never be perfectly certain of future price movements since human behavior is involved.

Figuring out the what and when…

All investors are faced with three basic questions with their investments. What to invest in, when to buy and when to sell. Technical analysis provides a framework for investors to methodically select equities and pick times to buy and sell. Emotion, the investor’s nemesis, is greatly reduced in these decisions since the investor can develop a list of ‘what and when’ rules to follow. Rather than ‘buying and hoping for the best’, technical analysts always know how much risk they are taking and know when to ‘get out while the getting is good’.

Only price and volume only…

Only historical price and volume data is used for technical analysis. The underlying premise of technical analysis is that all known information such as what a company does, its financial results, analyst’s ratings, management performance, politics, news, etc. are reflected in the historical price and volume data. This is a powerful concept since it is impossible to gage how these factors may influence future price separately.

It is important to understand technical analysis can only be used to determine the likely direction of future prices. It cannot anticipate news events or how investors will respond to them.

The Goal of Technical Analysis

The graph above is a historical price chart for the company Analog Devices, Inc., ticker symbol ADI. The line represents the price of ADI over a period of a year. The price chart illustrates how prices can move up, down or sideways for months at a time. Technical analysis uses methodologies to help indicate when prices are beginning to change direction. The goal of a technical analyst is to buy an equity when the price chart indicates prices are beginning to move up and then sell when the price chart indicates prices are beginning to move sideways or down.

Why Technical Analysis Works

Technical analysis works because price and volume often reveal the collective psychology (the “fear/greed balance”) of a market’s participants. Technical charts can reveal changes in the fear/greed balance soon after those changes occur and that provides opportunities for profitable trades. Technical analysts work to identify charts where the fear/greed balance has recently changed in a predictable manner. They then place trades to try and profit from that change. Once they have bought a stock, technical analysts monitor price and volume for sell signals. Done correctly, trades based on technical analysis carry a higher than average chance of success but disciplined money management techniques must still be used to guard against unforeseen price movements.

Misuse of Technical Analysis

While the basics of technical analysis are easy to learn, applying them correctly and successfully isn’t easy. Because of this many people have lost money using technical analysis techniques and then concluded that chart analysis has no value. In addition, unfortunately, many unsuspecting investors have purchased technical “systems” that promise outlandish returns for little effort. By the time the buyer figures out that the system doesn’t work, their money is long gone.

Technical analysis is just like any other money making occupation – it takes time and energy and it involves risk. Anybody who says otherwise shouldn’t be trusted. Here are ways technical analysis has been misused in the past:

The Holy Grail mentality…

One of the most common misconceptions about technical analysis is that a trading system (a set of buy and sell rules) can be devised that provides consistent profits with little to no risk.

There are several reasons that a ‘perfect system’ cannot be sustained. Firstly, the market is made up of people with free will and guided by fear and greed. A perfect system requires prices to consistently move in predictable patterns. This will never be possible when people are involved. Secondly, many financial institutions monitor the market for patterns of systematic trading. Once detected, the financial institution can take advantage of the system (investing with or against it) which eventually compromises and defeats the ‘perfect system’. And finally, what motivation could someone have to share a ‘perfect system’ at any price? Such a system would be invaluable to one person but worthless (for the second reason) if too many people or even one institution discovered it.

Just tell me what to buy…

Investment charlatans and gurus have always been offering advice how to profit in the market. These are the people who take financial advantage of new and uninformed investors by promising quick and profitable investment success. Claims of ultra-high rates of return or knowledge of future events for substantial fees are the best ways to identify such schemers.

Although a real guru is a spiritual guide or teacher, the title ‘Market Guru’ is gladly accepted by advisors who have developed notoriety with fortuitous calls of major market changes or unusual approaches to investing. Today’s TV media and Internet enthrone new market gurus on a regular basis. There are precious few true market gurus like Warren Buffet who have proven their market savvy over decades. Most market gurus can only provide profitable guidance as long as the market is favoring their investment philosophy. As the market changes, new market gurus will emerge as their philosophies’ agree with the new market dynamics.

Technical Analysis lets me control the market…

While few people consciously believe that they can control a stock’s price directly, subconsciously, chart analysis can give new investors a false sense of control which will cause them to lose objectivity. “My stock just broke below my trendline today, but it will come back tomorrow since that is a really good trendline!”

The opposite response is just as damaging – “My stock broke my trendline! T/A is worthless!” Both responses are driven by emotion, something that technical analysis strives to eliminate.

Next time, we'll take a critical look at the assumptions that Technical Analysis makes about the markets.

Next ChartWatchers Will Be Published Next Weekend

Just a reminder, ChartWatchers is published on the first and third full weekends of each month.  Our next issue will be published on the weekend of Feb. 21st., with articles appearing in this blog starting on Feb. 20th.

BTW, the US and Canadian Markets are closed on Monday, Feb. 16th due to the President's Day holiday in the US and the Family Day holiday in Canada.

NEW BLOGS, NEW CHARTWATCHERS, NEW BOOK FROM JOHN MURPHY!

Hello Fellow ChartWatchers!

This week is the start of big changes here at StockCharts.com.  We are moving much of our free content over into a new set of Blogs.  ("Blogs" are Web Logs - collections of articles on a particular topic.)  Things like, well, this newsletter are actually perfect for the Blog format.  And so, this is the first blog-based version of ChartWatchers!

What does that mean?  If you only read ChartWatchers as email in your mailbox, it doesn't mean much.  But if you look at ChartWatchers on the web, it means that you can now read many of the articles BEFORE they are sent out in email.  As soon as each author sends us their article, we'll add it to the ChartWatchers Blog area where you can read it immediately.  If you subscribe to that blog with a "Feed Notification tool", you'll get notified as soon as new articles are ready.  No more waiting until all the articles are complete!

(Again, don't panic.  If you like reading ChartWatchers as an email message, you don't need to do a thing.  It will still show up in your email box like it always has.)

Now, we didn't stop with just making ChartWatchers into a blog.  We added a slew of additional blogs that should help you get more value out of StockCharts.com.  Some of these currently contain some old content - we're in the process of migrating all the old ChartWatchers for example - and some of these are brand new!  Here's a run down:

StockCharts.com - Chip Anderson
A behind-the-scenes look at StockCharts.com from the president's perspective.

StockCharts.com - Don't Ignore This Chart!
A new feature from us.  A daily look at charts with interesting technical developments.

StockCharts.com - ChartWatchers
The new home for our free newsletter.  Look for articles to appear here first before they are sent out as complete emails.

StockCharts.com - Mailbag
Our "Letters to the Editor" blog.  Real questions from real users with real answers from the people that better darn well know... us!

StockCharts.com - Scanning Stocks
Tips, tricks and example stock scans that can help you get the most out of the StockCharts.com Scan Engine.

StockCharts.com - Status
Reports about server availability. Every day we'll post a summary of our service performance including how much downtime we had (if any).

StockCharts.com - Step by Step
Our tutorial blog with lots of easy to follow instructions for doing common tasks.  Charting, scanning, changing settings - even fixing common browser problems; all will be explained with lots of pictures to guide you through.

StockCharts.com - What's New
Latest announcements about new content and features on StockCharts.com.

I strongly encourage everyone to check out all these blogs on a regular basis and subscribe to them if you can.  We'll be updating them often.  Just click on the "Blogs" link on the left side of any of the pages on our website.

BIG NEWS: John Murphy has released "The Visual Investor, 2nd Edition"!

John's original version of "The Visual Investor" influenced me heavily.  It was extremely easy to read and it has helped hundreds of thousands of people understand how to use financial charts to make investing decisions.  Now John has completely revised "The Visual Investor" to bring it into the age of the Internet.  New charts, new chapters, new examples - but with the same old easy-to-read logic that has helped a generation of chartists get started.

I CANNOT RECOMMEND THIS BOOK HIGHLY ENOUGH!

...which is why we have it on sale in our bookstore right now.  Get you copy now.

MACD LINES SHOW SOME PROMISE

A reader complained this week that we failed to point out the "negative divergence" in the daily MACD lines during January prior to the latest downturn. The reason I didn't point it out was because none existed. In fact, it may be the other way around. At the moment, the daily MACD lines look more positive than negative. Chart 1 overlays the MACD lines (and MACD histogram) over daily bars for the S&P 500. The chart shows that the MACD lines bottomed during October and gave a positive divergence during November (rising trendline) before rallying into the start of January. No negative divergence was given at the early January top. Although the S&P fell to the lowest level in two months during January, the MACD lines remained well above their earlier lows. The lines have now turned positive again (see circle). To me, that looks like positive divergence and hints at more market strength. The market is rallying today with the biggest gains coming from financial stocks (and banks in particular). The S&P is up more than 2% and is nearing a test of last week's intra-day high at 877. A close through that initial chart barrier would strengthen the market's "short-term" trend and keep the three-month trading range intact. There's even more good news.

OBV AND RELATIVE STRENGTH DRIVE QQQQ

The Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQQ) is breaking out of its trading range. The chart below shows QQQQ stuck in a trading since 10-Oct. Focusing on the blue dotted line marking the mid October lows, we can see that QQQQ traded above and below this line numerous times the last four months. In essence, QQQQ went nowhere from 10-Oct until early February. A triangle formed from early November as the trading range narrowed over the last two months.

QQQQ could be finding direction now. With an advance over the last five days, QQQQ broke the triangle trendline and is closing in on resistance from the early January high (red line). A breakout here would be quite positive and argue for a counter-trend rally. The big trend remains down, but bear market rallies are perfectly normal. QQQQ could possibly make it to the falling 200-day moving average.

 

Relative strength and On Balance Volume (OBV) confirm the triangle breakout. The first indicator shows QQQQ relative to SPY. This relative strength comparative rises when QQQQ outperforms SPY and falls when QQQQ underperforms. QQQQ has been outperforming since the second week of January because that is when the relative strength comparative broke resistance. On Balance Volume (OBV) is a cumulative indicator that adds volume on up days and subtracts volume on down days. Granville theorized that volume leads prices. If this is the case, then OBV suggests that QQQQ will break its January high soon. Notice that OBV broke its December and January highs this week.

Click here for a video presentation of this information.

JANUARY FORECASTS A DOWN YEAR

Research published by Yale Hirsch in the "Trader's Almanac" shows that market performance during the month of January often predicts market performance for the entire year. The January "barometer" has been particularly prescient in odd years (the first year of a new Congress), with only two misses in 69 years (as of 12/31/2008). While the January barometer has a good record of prediction, I still put it in the "for what its worth" column, because I can't think of any sound reason why it should work, and in many years it seems that a correct forecast is simply serendipity.

As usual we think you should view charts of actual market movement before making decisions based on reported average performance. For example, in 1987 the January Barometer forecast an up year. Well, it was an up year, but what a wild ride! On our website we have an extensive series of these charts going back to 1920. It is worth studying the charts so that you have an educated opinion of how this forecast device really works.

Bottom Line: The January barometer predicts that 2009 will be a down year. Regardless of what the barometer says, I think it is wishful thinking to believe that 2009 will be a winner. Consumers, which are 70% of our economy, are scared to death for their jobs. Until unemployment stops rising I think investor risk aversion will remain high.

FOCUSING ON THE ENERGY SECTOR

Our focus today is upon the Energy Sector (XLE) and its relative valuation to the S&P 500 Spyders (SPY). Given the current bear market, we've found recently that market participants are once again willing
to return aggressively to what they know worked rather well in the last bull market - buying energy stocks as the dwindling world energy supply story continues to get quite a bit of play. We think this is
wrong-headed, for Energy is a "late cycle mover" rather than an "early cycle mover" out of recessions. Perhaps it is different this time; but we think not. Hence, we believe it wise to consider lightening up
aggressive overweight energy positions, and in some cases...we would advocate selling short the exploration & production group. We aren't as bearish on the oil service group, but that is a story for another day.

Technically speaking, the ratio has declined from its high of .70 to an initial low at .49, and from that point to today...a bearish sideways consolidation has formed upwards into the 200-day moving average. Perhaps just as important, this moving average is itself rolling over in bearish fashion. Reasonably thinking, we would expect it then to prove its merit as resistance, and for another leg lower to
develop to below the recent low at .49...into the 2005-to-2007 consolidation range. For those Elliotticians out there, this would be a simple A-B-C correction; which would give us two peaks upon which to
draw a declining trendline - a line in the sand upon which when broken above, would then signal the development of the next relative energy bull market. Until then, there is quite a bit of risk holding energy
shares.

BERMUDA TRIANGLE - WALL STREET STYLE

We've seen this all before.  The sure-fire short setups get waxed as trendline support holds.  Then the bulls grow confident as the market soars only to get turned back by trendline resistance.  The cycle continues to repeat itself until we get resolution.  If you time your entries perfectly, the triangle formations can be powerful trading patterns, but patience and extreme discipline is required.

Right now, the market is faced with exactly that triangle mentality.  The triangle keeps squeezing with each high moving lower and every low moving higher.  At some point, something must give.  That time is quickly approaching.  The breaking of the triangle pattern doesn't necessarily dictate whether the bear market ends.  In fact, I would argue it doesn't matter at all.  It does matter whether the bulls can turn the recent upside action into something longer lasting, however.

Let's take a look at the unfolding triangles, first on the S&P 500:

Next, the NASDAQ:

There is one difference on the buying this time - it's the volume that's accompanying the move higher.  Any time we can get the price movement and volume confirmation, it's much more bullish.  We haven't broken resistance though.  Until we do, the volume is not as meaningful.  Whether we see enough bullishness to crack through triangle resistance is a story for next week.
 
The odds of reaching that first Fibonacci retracement (38.2%) area increases greatly if the major indices can break their current triangle patterns with heavy volume.  That's what I'll be looking for as next week unfolds.  Also, financials helped to spark the turnaround on Thursday morning and the rally has continued in that space since.  If and when that rally ends, it will likely signal the end to the overall market rally as well.
 
Happy trading!

No ChartWatchers This Weekend

Just a reminder that ChartWatchers is published on the first and third full weekends of each month.  Since Feb. 1st falls on a Sunday this year, we'll be publishing ChartWatchers next weekend.